Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sada Nahimana vs Lavinia Tanasie Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nahimana vs Tanasie analysis and find out who is favored!
Sada Nahimana vs Lavinia Tanasie Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nahimana 1 - 0 Tanasie
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nahimana has won 44.07% of points on their second serve, while Tanasie has won 39.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nahimana, in recent form, has won 57.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tanasie has won 59.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.94% and 48.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nahimana has saved 53.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tanasie has saved 53.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nahimana has won 53.23% of matches played (W/L 33/ 29), with Tanasie winning 60.47% (W/L 26/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nahimana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 40/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10). Tanasie has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 85/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Nahimana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.45% of matches (W/L 31/ 27), where as Tanasie has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nahimana winning 1 times and Tanasie being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nahimana winning 2 and Tanasie winning 0. The last match between Nahimana and Tanasie was at the W25 Otocec, 28-09-2022, First, Clay with Sada Nahimana getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nahimana and Tanasie have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nahimana winning 0 times and Tanasie 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nahimana winning 0, and Tanasie 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nahimana has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.42 while Tanasie has played against players with an average rank of 118.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nahimana has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tanasie has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nahimana has converted 52.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tanasie has converted 55.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
364
Rank
244
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
766
Rank
602
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
59% (160-109)
Career Total W/L
62% (90-56)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Lavinia Tanasie |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (32/51) | 68% (30/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (18/32) | 30% (9/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 29% (4/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 70% (31/44) | 47% (24/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Sada Nahimana
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Lavinia Tanasie |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (29/26) | 60% (31/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (250/230) | 55% (252/210) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 62% (13/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 37 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 102 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:40 | 1:52:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 266.33 | 96.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1128/1623) | 64% (980/1532) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (671/1128) | 57% (557/980) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (210/495) | 40% (219/552) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (106/197) | 55% (123/223) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (737/1575) | 52% (780/1487) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (11/10) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 63% (12/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Sada Nahimana
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Luisa Meyer Auf Der Heide
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Sada Nahimana
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Diana Demidova
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Sada Nahimana
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
85%
(
71 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Emma Lene
86%
(
74 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Diana Martynov
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Elena Milovanovic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Sada Nahimana
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lavinia Tanasie Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Olivia Bergler
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
28 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
52%
(
37 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Lavinia Luciano
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Alexia Iulia Marginean
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
62%
(
76 of
122)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
55 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Ioana Zvonaru
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nahimana Vs Tanasie Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nahimana are available here and Tanasie photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
